 
            |
 |
Dealing
with the Crisis of
a Workplace Threat of Violence
A
former employee tells a co-worker he'll "get even with the company for
firing me";
Co-workers
of a battered woman tell their security manager they fear her jealous
husband will bring his threats to kill her into the workplace;
A
supervisor tells his HR manager a subordinate is making "increasingly
bizarre and angry statements about his disagreements with the company's
course".
Who
actually may do harm, how soon, and what are prudent steps for employers
to take in these kinds of scenarios?
Although
most employers and managers are aware of the possibility of workplace
violence, when faced with it the first time they quickly realize the need
for accurate information and direction. Whether or not this is a
new experience for you or your organization, here are some helpful tips:
| • |
Many
cases can be screened or assessed as not presenting a risk of violence
with a minimum of invested expert time and expense. The sooner
a case of concern is identified and reviewed, the more likely it is
either not a risk, or can be managed successfully. Emergencies
needing prompt law enforcement or security responses do occur, but
few cases pose an imminent, immediate risk. |
| • |
The
warning signs, predictors, and contexts
that lead to workplace "grudge" or targeted violence are well-understood
and can be focused on quickly.
|
| • |
Hasty,
ill-informed actions to terminate, discipline, incarcerate, or otherwise
attempt to distance from or punish the individual for threats or serious
misconduct may trigger feelings of humiliation and rage, which will
increase the possibility of violence in some cases. A
number of possible response options exist, but looking for a "cook
book" to manage all situations is unlikely to guarantee success, or
protection from various employer exposures. |
| • |
As
incidents increase in apparent seriousness, effective case assessment
and management require an organized, multi-disciplinary response
on the part of the employer.
|
| • |
The
disciplines to be involved include human resources, security, employment
law, assessment and incident management specialization, as well as
key management leadership and, when appropriate, effective law enforcement
liaison. With increased risk levels, no one specialty should
expect to resolve cases without the assistance of the other disciplines.
|
| • |
Separation
and other employment decisions and security strategies are greatly
improved with risk assessment data, much of which is readily accessible,
legally obtainable, and very useful to risk assessment specialists
assisting employers. |
WTS
will assist with crisis or case assessment and strategy in
the following manner:
| • |
Initial
risk screening
provided by telephone to assist the employer in determining the
apparent level and category of violence risk
|
| • |
Incident
management consultation which may include steps for further investigation
and assessment, strategies to defuse volatile individuals, communication
guidelines, and a plan to resolve situations safely and appropriately
|
| • |
Formal
expert risk assessments
in face-to-face meetings with employees or other individuals posing
a concern about violent behavior
|
| • |
Collaboration
with your multi-disciplinary resources including legal, security,
and human resources toward an integrated and sensible response to
cases
|
| • |
Continuing
analysis and monitoring of all case-relevant data available to
update opinions of risk that translate into appropriate, safe, and
balanced employer actions |
| • |
Education
and de-briefing of affected "targets" and other employees with
information appropriate for their own security decisions and resolution
of their personal emotions
|
| • |
Recommendations
for additional specialized resources
such as attorneys, investigators, and security professionals whom
we consider well qualified in the area of workplace threat management,
should our clients need these resources
|
©
2011 Stephen G. White and WTS Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|